The strongest issue is the broad post-project non-compete, which could block similar editing work for unrelated clients.
This sample editor agreement contains several one-sided terms that restrict future work, expand unpaid scope, and weaken your leverage if the client cancels mid-project.
12-month category non-compete
High risk
This restriction blocks you from taking similar gigs for a full year, even if the work comes from unrelated clients.
Clause excerpt
“Contractor agrees not to provide editing or post-production services for any business operating in the same category for twelve (12) months after the project ends.”
Ambiguous kill-fee terms
High risk
If the project is cancelled mid-edit, the contract does not guarantee payment for approved work in progress or reserved production time.
Clause excerpt
“Client may terminate this Agreement at any time. Contractor will be paid only for deliverables accepted by Client in its sole discretion.”
Broad portfolio restriction
Medium risk
The current language can prevent you from showing finished work in your reel, which limits your ability to win future business.
Clause excerpt
“Contractor may not display any project materials in marketing samples, reels, or public portfolios without prior written approval.”
3 more issues found
Upgrade to see the full analysis and counter-offer language for every flagged clause.